Communicating matters
View Sequence overviewStudents will:
- re-examine substances and considering how to answer questions about them, with supporting evidence.
- predict the behaviour of the particles that make up difficult to categorise substances.
- consider how they are building on the work of other scientists and science communicators.
Students will represent their understanding as they:
- contribute to discussions about difficult to classify substances.
- consider ways to effectively communicate science ideas.
In this lesson, assessment is formative.
Feedback might focus on:
- the questions students ask/anticipate. Can they be answered in detail by what has been learned in this teaching sequence? Or will they require further investigation?
Whole class
Class science journal (digital or hard copy)
Each group
Samples of substances students have examined during the teaching sequence, including those that were difficult to classify
Each student
Individual science journal (digital or hard copy)
Lesson
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkRe-orient
Review what has been learned so far about the properties of solids, liquids and gases.
Review the role of a science communicator, and discuss again how students are going to create a text to convey the ideas they have learnt to their specific audience, and why these ideas are important.
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkIdentifying and constructing questions is the creative driver of the inquiry process. It allows students to explore what they know and how they know it. During the Inquire phase of the LIA Framework, the Question routine allows for past activities to be reviewed and to set the scene for the investigation that students will undertake. The use of effective questioning techniques can influence students’ view and interpretation of upcoming content, open them to exploration and link to their current interests and science capital.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to spend some time considering the mindset of students at the start of each Inquire phase. What do you want students to be thinking about, what do they already know and what is the best way for them to approach the task? What might tap into their curiosity?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkWhat should we communicate?
Pose the questions: What is important for people to know about solids, liquids and gases? What questions might be asked about them? How might we respond?
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkThe Investigate routine provides students with an opportunity to explore the key ideas of science, to plan and conduct an investigation, and to gather and record data. The investigations are designed to systematically develop content knowledge and skills through increasingly complex processes of structured inquiry, guided inquiry and open inquiry approaches. Students are encouraged to process data to identify trends and patterns and link them to the real-world context of the teaching sequence.
When designing a teaching sequence, consider the diagnostic assessment (Launch phase) that identified the alternative conceptions that students held. Are there activities that challenge these ideas and provide openings for discussion? What content knowledge and skills do students need to be able to complete the final (Act phase) task? How could you systematically build these through the investigation routines? Are there opportunities to build students’ understanding and skills in the science inquiry processes through the successive investigations?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkPreparing to communicate: reviewing
Re-examine the samples of the substances students have looked at during the course of the sequence, including any they had difficulty categorising, including oobleck, honey, various powdered solids, carbonated drinks (soft drink, mineral water), sponges etc.
In collaborative teams, students:
- examine various substances.
- discuss/record:
- if each substance is a solid, liquid or gas.
- if it might be difficult to categorise and why.
- the category they would place it in.
- why they would place it there.
- represent what they think its particle structure might look like and why they think that.
- consider the questions they might be asked about substances, and how they might answer them.
Prompt teams' thinking with sample questions if required:
- If something can be poured, wouldn’t it be a liquid?
- Is soft drink a liquid or a gas?
- If something is soft, how can it be a solid?
Teams might also:
- revise the terms used during this teaching sequence.
- consider the amount of ‘science knowledge’ the audience may or may not already have, including the vocabulary they might use.
- consider how they might, like a science communicator, use everyday language to communicate their ideas.
- consider how these ideas are important to their audience, and why it might be important to know them.
Communicating science ideas
Science communicators effectively communicate science ideas to all.
The goals of science communicators are to effectively communicate science ideas to all, to raise public awareness of and interest in science, and to engage diverse communities with science.
They use a variety of literary techniques, including persuasion, storytelling, humour and metaphors to connect with an audience’s interests and values.
By thinking about how they might communicate science ideas effectively, and engage potentially disinterested people in science, students are not only building their own science capital, but potentially the science capital of those around them.
The goals of science communicators are to effectively communicate science ideas to all, to raise public awareness of and interest in science, and to engage diverse communities with science.
They use a variety of literary techniques, including persuasion, storytelling, humour and metaphors to connect with an audience’s interests and values.
By thinking about how they might communicate science ideas effectively, and engage potentially disinterested people in science, students are not only building their own science capital, but potentially the science capital of those around them.
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkFollowing an investigation, the Integrate routine provides time and space for data to be evaluated and insights to be synthesized. It reveals new insights, consolidates and refines representations, generalises context and broadens students’ perspectives. It allows student thinking to become visible and opens formative feedback opportunities. It may also lead to further questions being asked, allowing the Inquire phase to start again.
When designing a teaching sequence, consider the diagnostic assessment that was undertaken during the Launch phase. Consider if alternative conceptions could be used as a jumping off point to discussions. How could students represent their learning in a way that would support formative feedback opportunities? Could small summative assessment occur at different stages in the teaching sequence?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkPreparing to communicate: collaborating
Share teams’ ideas about the substances they re-examined as a class.
- How did you categorise some of the trickier substances?
- Why did you categorise that way?
- What do you think the particle structure would look like?
- Do you think the properties of these trickier substances could be changed? How?
- What would adding water, heat etc. do to the substances?
Teams then share the questions they think they might be asked about solids, liquids and gases, and the potential answers they have prepared. Record these in the class science journal.
Ask other teams if they might add any details to these potential answers, including considering how they might refer to particle theory in the explanations/answers.
Highlight that, by collaborating and building on each others’ work, they are behaving like scientists and science communicators who have investigated and communicated about particles before them.
- What questions do you think people will ask you about the substances?
- What responses might you give?
- How can we build upon each other’s work to be the most prepared as possible to answer these questions?
- How are we building on past scientists'/science communicators' work?
Reflect on the lesson
You might:
- reflect on the list of solids, liquids and gases, created throughout the teaching sequence, as well as some of the trickier substances students have encountered. How confident do they feel that substances have been categorised correctly?
- add to the class word wall of vocabulary related to solids, liquids and gases.
- add to the class TWLH, completing the H and L sections with what they have learned about particles.