Make it move!
View Sequence overviewStudents will:
- investigate how the shape of an object affects its ability to roll.
- investigate how far things roll on different surfaces.
- measure and compare, with assistance, how far objects roll.
Students will represent their understanding as they:
- participate in discussion to generate explanations, compare ideas and relate evidence to explanations about rolling.
- represent their understanding of rolling using informal measurements.
In this lesson, assessment is formative.
Feedback might focus on:
- the questions students pose. Are they related to their personal experiences and observations?
- If questions do not seem to be relevant to students’ experiences and observations, make a note to focus on supporting them to connect their observations to things they might want to know.
- students’ predictions. Are they able to make predictions about which objects will roll and relate these predictions to their past experiences?
- students’ observations. With guidance, are they able to contribute to the creation of a graph through observations about which object rolled the furthest?
- students’ communication. Are they able to share their predictions, observations, and ideas with others?
Whole class
Class science journal (digital or hard-copy)
Objects that can be passed around by students in a circle, as used in Lessons 1-3, with a focus on objects that students can try to pass by rolling (including spherical, cuboid and irregularly shaped objects)
A marble run and marbles, set up a few days before the lesson so that students have had the opportunity to play with it. Simple marble runs can be purchased at toy stores. A homemade marble run can be constructed with paper tubes, items to act as a ramp, and any balls of a suitable size.
Demonstration copy of the Marble run concept cartoon Resource sheet
A selection of different spherical objects, for example: a marble, cricket ball, tennis ball, baseball, ping pong ball, as well as at least one spherical but unusually-shaped thing such as a kiwifruit or an avocado.
A ramp for rolling objects down. You might use a length of wood, a chopping board, or a large hardcover book, propped up by a stack of books, a chair or a table. Ensure the ramp is not set at too steep or too shallow an angle, and that there is enough room for objects to continue rolling once they’ve cleared the ramp.
Demonstration copy of the Rolling investigation planner Resource sheet
Streamers or similar (string, wool etc.) for measuring lengths
Lesson
Re-orient
In the days/weeks leading up to this lesson, set up a marble run in the classroom (see the List of materials for details). Allow students time and opportunity to interact with it and make observations about what happens.
To begin this lesson, replay the passing game played in Lesson 1, and re-enacted in Lessons 2 and 3. Explain to students that this time, when they play the game, they will only pass the objects by rolling. Before they roll, they need to select an object they think will roll well and explain why they selected it.
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkIdentifying and constructing questions is the creative driver of the inquiry process. It allows students to explore what they know and how they know it. During the Inquire phase of the LIA Framework, the Question routine allows for past activities to be reviewed and to set the scene for the investigation that students will undertake. The use of effective questioning techniques can influence students’ view and interpretation of upcoming content, open them to exploration and link to their current interests and science capital.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to spend some time considering the mindset of students at the start of each Inquire phase. What do you want students to be thinking about, what do they already know and what is the best way for them to approach the task? What might tap into their curiosity?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkRolling, rolling, rolling
Model the movement of rolling objects with students in various ways, for example, by rolling arms/hands over each other, or by rolling an object.
Make an obvious mark on a large ball and watch the mark as the ball rolls, so students can see that the ball is ‘going around and around’. Compare it to the movement of sliding something across the floor or a table, and discuss how rolling and sliding are different.
Define the movement of rolling in simple terms, for example: something turning over and over again, or going around and around as it moves.
Optional: If developmentally appropriate, you might also discuss the difference between spinning and rolling: spinning tends to occur on the same spot, while rolling involves moving along a surface.
Discuss students’ experiences and observations interacting with the marble run in the lead up to the lesson.
Examine and discuss what is happening in the cartoon found on the Marble run concept cartoon Resource sheet. Discuss students’ recent experiences using the marble run (that was set up prior to this lesson), what they’ve learned, and any problems they encountered.
- What did you observe when you were playing with the marble run?
- Did the marble/ball always roll freely? Or did it sometimes get stuck?
- Why do you think that happened?
- Did the marble sometimes move faster through parts of the marble run? Where? Why do you think that happened?
- The kids in the cartoon are making predictions about their marble run. What predictions have they made?
- Glass will roll better than plastic.
- Small things will roll better than big things.
- Some shapes will roll better than others.
- Does this match what you experienced with the marble run? How?
Pose the questions: What might make it easy for something to roll down a ramp? What might make it harder? Record students’ ideas in the class science journal.
Next, pose the question: Does the type of ball used change how far the ball will roll down a ramp?
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkThe Investigate routine provides students with an opportunity to explore the key ideas of science, to plan and conduct an investigation, and to gather and record data. The investigations are designed to systematically develop content knowledge and skills through increasingly complex processes of structured inquiry, guided inquiry and open inquiry approaches. Students are encouraged to process data to identify trends and patterns and link them to the real-world context of the teaching sequence.
When designing a teaching sequence, consider the diagnostic assessment (Launch phase) that identified the alternative conceptions that students held. Are there activities that challenge these ideas and provide openings for discussion? What content knowledge and skills do students need to be able to complete the final (Act phase) task? How could you systematically build these through the investigation routines? Are there opportunities to build students’ understanding and skills in the science inquiry processes through the successive investigations?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkOn a roll
Explain to the students that scientists ask questions, test their predictions, plan and carry out tests to find things out. Tell them that they will be working like scientists to find out if changing the object being rolled will affect how far it will travel.
Show students an appropriate number of different spherical objects. The number of objects you select will be determined by the readiness of your students to deal with complexity. The more objects you look at, the more complex the comparisons and investigation will be.
Give students the opportunity to make observations about each object and together construct some comparative statements about the differences between them, like the materials they are made from, their weights, or their shape. For example: The cricket ball is heavier than the tennis ball, The marble is made of glass and the ping pong ball is made of plastic, or The baseball is more round than the kiwifruit.
Using the demonstration copy of the Rolling investigation planner Resource sheet, as a class complete the Predict and Reason sections of the PROE (Predict, Reason, Observe, Explain), with students nominating which object they think will roll the furthest and why they think that. You might make a tally of the number of students that think each object will roll the furthest, then record the reasons of a few students. You can support students reasoning by making connections between their previous experiences of playing different games/sports or playing with the marble run.
Next undertake the investigation as a whole class.
First, with or for students (as appropriate) list in the class science journal:
- What will be changed in the investigation: the object being rolled.
- What will be measured at the end of the investigation: the distance the object rolls.
- What will stay the same in the investigation: the height of the ramp, what the ramp is made out of, how we measure how far each object rolls.
Show students the streamers or other method for measuring the distance, and explain how measurements will be taken:
- The end of the streamer will be placed at the top of the ramp next to the item to be rolled.
- After the item has been rolled, you will unravel enough of the streamer to reach where the object stopped, and cut the streamer off.
- The length of the streamer will show how far the object rolled.
Emphasise that the ramp gives all the things the same, fair start—just place and then let go! You might also model the difference between simply letting the item go and giving it a ‘push’ start, and discuss why this would not be fair.
Roll each item you have selected for testing, and measure the distance rolled as described above.
Predict, Reason, Observe, Explain
What is PROE and how will it benefit your students?
This is an opportunity to introduce the PROE approach to scientific investigation from the very first year in formal education.
PROE is a tool to engage students in the investigative process and support deep thinking. It can be implemented with a class, collaborative teams or individually to monitor students thinking and provide feedback to guide inquiry. It provides a structure for inquiry that encourages students to develop argumentation skills.
Before an investigation, students Predict what they think will happen and give Reasons for their prediction. During the investigation students Observe what happens. When the investigation is completed, students Explain why they think these things happened and compare it to their prediction and the findings of others.
Modelling and guiding Foundation students in this process can support them in subsequent years of schooling, and supports them to begin linking evidence to their observations.
At this stage, students’ reasoning for their predictions will likely connect to their recent experiences from the lessons in the sequence, as they are explicitly connected. Students may not have outside experiences to draw on or the scientific understanding to provide sound reasoning for their predictions.
All reasons are valid and should be accepted at this stage, as the purpose is to simply get students used to having to give a reason for their thinking.
This is an opportunity to introduce the PROE approach to scientific investigation from the very first year in formal education.
PROE is a tool to engage students in the investigative process and support deep thinking. It can be implemented with a class, collaborative teams or individually to monitor students thinking and provide feedback to guide inquiry. It provides a structure for inquiry that encourages students to develop argumentation skills.
Before an investigation, students Predict what they think will happen and give Reasons for their prediction. During the investigation students Observe what happens. When the investigation is completed, students Explain why they think these things happened and compare it to their prediction and the findings of others.
Modelling and guiding Foundation students in this process can support them in subsequent years of schooling, and supports them to begin linking evidence to their observations.
At this stage, students’ reasoning for their predictions will likely connect to their recent experiences from the lessons in the sequence, as they are explicitly connected. Students may not have outside experiences to draw on or the scientific understanding to provide sound reasoning for their predictions.
All reasons are valid and should be accepted at this stage, as the purpose is to simply get students used to having to give a reason for their thinking.
The Inquire phase allows students to cycle progressively and with increasing complexity through the key science ideas related to the core concepts. Each Inquire cycle is divided into three teaching and learning routines that allow students to systematically build their knowledge and skills in science and incorporate this into their current understanding of the world.
When designing a teaching sequence, it is important to consider the knowledge and skills that students will need in the final Act phase. Consider what the students already know and identify the steps that need to be taken to reach the level required. How could you facilitate students’ understanding at each step? What investigations could be designed to build the skills at each step?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkFollowing an investigation, the Integrate routine provides time and space for data to be evaluated and insights to be synthesized. It reveals new insights, consolidates and refines representations, generalises context and broadens students’ perspectives. It allows student thinking to become visible and opens formative feedback opportunities. It may also lead to further questions being asked, allowing the Inquire phase to start again.
When designing a teaching sequence, consider the diagnostic assessment that was undertaken during the Launch phase. Consider if alternative conceptions could be used as a jumping off point to discussions. How could students represent their learning in a way that would support formative feedback opportunities? Could small summative assessment occur at different stages in the teaching sequence?
Read more about using the LIA FrameworkExplaining results
In this Integrate step, guide students to link their experiences during the investigation to the concepts about movement being explored. Through questioning and discussion, students should come to a consensus that:
|
Make a simple column graph for students by placing the streamers next to each other.

Together, complete the Observe and Explain sections of the PROE by recording which object rolled the furthest, in reference to the graph, and why students think this happened. Students’ explanations may not be scientifically accurate—the purpose of the activity is simply to provide opportunities for them to experience this type of scientific analysis.
Referring to the definition of rolling earlier in the lesson, present students with the statement: Round things roll better because it’s easier for them to turn over and over again. Ask students if they agree with this statement or not, and why. Consider if the data on the graph proves this statement—did the objects that were ‘more round’ roll further than the ones that were ‘less round’.
Discuss why it’s easier for round things to roll over and over. You might look at how corners of square objects ‘catch’ on the ground and stop objects from rolling, or how round objects have less contact with the ground as compared to square ones. Demonstration using spherical and cuboid objects is a good way to establish this.
Ask students to name the materials that the objects were made of, and if they think the materials had any impact on the object’s ability to roll. You might draw attention to texture here as well, for example that a tennis ball is ‘furry’ whilst a ball-pit ball is smooth. Discuss and record any relevant ideas for reference in the next lesson.
Ask students if they have any other questions they might like answered as a result of the investigation.
- What other questions do you have?
- How might we investigate to find the answers?
- What else might change how far the ball rolls?
Reflect on the lesson
You might:
- ask students to think about what other factors may influence the movement of a ball rolling down a ramp.
- add to the class word wall any vocabulary related to rolling, fair testing, investigations, etc.
- re-examine the intended learning goals for the lesson and consider how they were achieved.
- discuss how students were thinking and working like scientists during the lesson. Focus on looking at data to provide evidence.